Why is this? If it belongs in the article it should be visible, if it doesn't why is it in the source? Thryduulf 10:10, (UTC) I've just reworded a sentence slightly in this section (I still don't like the repetition of some in "Some Wikipedians have noted that some" but can't think at this moment how to rephrase to avoid it.) and spotted that there is much more criticsim hidden in comment tags. 48 not only in english language/wikipedia.40 Originally available for sale on a DVD?. 30 Some possible changes to this article.27 Animations, Videos and Some Articles.25 There's no way to prove this was really by him.22 History Section: Date/Grammar mismatch.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |